Language selection

Search

Trade secret protection

Trade secret

Any data or information that relates to businesses and is not known to the general public along with reasonable attempts being made to keep such information confidential qualifies as a trade secret.

Current framework of trade secret protection in India

In this age of globalization, where companies offshore to various countries for expansion as well as cheaper labour, it becomes difficult to protect business strategies and secrets.

Businesses view technology as secrets rather than patentable information. This is mainly because competition in markets has reached a level where competitors innovate once information is available. Though this gives rise to healthy competition, it becomes difficult for new businesses to keep up or flourish once such information is made available.

Countries today recognize the need for such secrecy and thus are trying to incorporate protection in their legal frameworks.

In the international community, development of trade secret protection can be traced to Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS), the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

Article 39 of the TRIPS requires countries to protect information within the control of natural or legal persons and lays down three essentials to classified information as trade secret, namely:

Although India has no specific trade secrets law, Indian courts have upheld trade secrets protection under various statutes, including contract law, copyright law, the principles of equity and – at times – the common law action of breach of confidence (which in effect amounts to a breach of contractual obligation). Section 72 of the Information Technology Act 2000 also provides certain protection, although this is limited to electronic records. 

Under contract laws

Indian courts have upheld trade secret protection under principles of equity and contractual obligation.

Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act makes this evident due to the provision relating to restrain of trade. This section bars any person from disclosing any information which he acquires as a result of a contract.

Breach of confidence

Another way in which Indian courts have granted protection of trade secrets is by extending the original covenant of confidentiality to a third party who has obtained such confidential information under confidence. This can be illustrated by way of an example. Suppose B is an employee of A and he is bound by a non-disclosure agreement. Now, C incites B to give him confidential information received by B in confidence. C misappropriated such information. C would be liable under breach of confidence even though he had no express agreement with A regarding use and disclosure of confidential information.

Equity

Indian courts have also relied upon principles of equity to hold the misappropriating party guilty by establishing an implied covenant of confidentiality between the parties.

This concept was first laid down by Delhi High Court in John Richard Brady v. Chemical Process Equipments P. Ltd. where the Court, while exercising its powers under the wider equitable jurisdiction, awarded an injunction even when there was no contract.

The Court opined that even in the absence of an express confidentiality clause, confidentiality can be implied from the surrounding facts and circumstances and in such cases, the defendant would be liable for breach of implied confidentiality obligations.

A reading of these concepts reveal that confidentiality claims may arise in the following circumstances:

Remedies for infringement of trade secrets

The remedies available to the owners of trade secrets are: 

Safeguards used by budding entrepreneurs to protect their business secrets

Safeguarding trade secrets is essential for entrepreneurs and small business owners. If the products or services derives a lot of novelty due to such trade secrets and thus lead to the flourishing of the businesses, they will invariably attract attention. This will lead to a lot of competition especially against major businesses that have already made a mark in the market.

The following are certain steps that SMEs can take to protect such information and maintain secrecy:

Disclaimer

The Canadian Trade Commissioner Service in India recommends that readers seek professional advice regarding their particular circumstances. This publication should not be relied on as a substitute for such professional advice. The Government of Canada does not guarantee the accuracy of any of the information contained on this page. Readers should independently verify the accuracy and reliability of the information.

Content on this page is provided by Dezan Shira & Associates a pan-Asia, multi-disciplinary professional services firm, providing legal, tax, and operational advisory to international corporate investors.

Date modified: